Cosmetic dermatology is a specialised field of dermatology that focuses on procedures that improve appearance of the skin, particularly on the face and neck. It is also known as aesthetic dermatology or aesthetic medicine.
What is an example of cosmetic dermatology?
Dermatologists are the go-to doctor when you have skin concerns. However, there are a few different types of dermatologists, but the most commonly utilized ones are cosmetic and medical dermatologists. How do you know which one you’re supposed to visit? Cosmetic Dermatology Cosmetic dermatologists are the doctors you go to when you want to improve your appearance in addition to treating your skin issues.
- These doctors are still trained to perform surgical procedures, but their focus is also on helping you look good while treating serious medical conditions.
- For example, a cosmetic dermatologist will see patients with psoriasis, but as they’re treating the problem, they’ll also be striving to reduce the appearance of the plaques on visible parts of the body.
These doctors will also see someone who has skin cancer, but they’re adamant about not having significant scarring when they have it removed. Cosmetic dermatology may include things like BOTOX®, dermal fillers, skin tightening, chemical peels and a variety of other appearance-improving procedures.
Most cosmetic dermatologists also offer services like laser hair removal and a variety of laser skin treatments, Some cosmetic dermatologists offer treatment options for spider veins, too. If you have any medical skin-related problems along with significant cosmetic concerns, you’d want to see a cosmetic dermatologist.
If you don’t have any medical issues, but you want to improve or change the appearance of your skin, a cosmetic dermatologist will also be able to help you address any of these concerns. Medical Dermatology This area of dermatology helps patients with various skin diseases or ailments that are affecting their quality of life or health.
acne contact allergies alopecia skin cancer warts transplant dermatology eczema psoriasis or rosacea
While a medical dermatologist can also be seen for skin-related issues, Pinnacle Dermatology offers treatment of most all of the above skin problems in addition to cosmetic services. The difference between medical and cosmetic dermatologists isn’t that significant; it mostly depends on what final results you’re after.
What is cosmetic vs regular derm?
Cosmetic And Medical Dermatology – What’s the Difference? – The field of dermatology is divided into two branches – medical and cosmetic. Cosmetic dermatology caters to patients looking to maintain their youthful appearance by reversing the signs of aging or wanting to make aesthetic changes or improvements to their skin.
Is acne treatment cosmetic or medical?
28 Nov Acne is Both a Cosmetic and Medical Concern – Acne is often thought of as a cosmetic issue, but the reality is that it is both a medical and cosmetic concern. RefinedMD offers a wide range of specialized acne treatments to tackle the root of your specific type of acne while also treating cosmetic issues that can decrease confidence.
What is a clinical dermatology?
Clinical Dermatology Clinical Dermatology is the speciality of medicine that encompasses the complete range of diseases and conditions of the skin, hair and nails. Skin, the largest organ, visibly covers more than 90 percent of the body; hair and nails comprise another 8 percent.
- Your skin is also your first line of defence against infection and other elements.
- Maintaining healthy skin, hair and nail is the key to looking and feeling good about one’s self.
- When it comes to Clinical Dermatology, diagnosing and providing individualized treatment specific to the individual needs is the key.
At The Skin Clinic, all diseases and medical conditions related to skin, hair and nails are diagnosed and treated by our team of highly skilled dermatologists who have paramount expertise in treating the full range of clinical dermatology-related issues.
- At The Skin Clinic, we take care of Rash Evaluation, Mole Checks, Acne Treatment, Rosacea Treatment, Skin Cancer Detection and Treatment, Proactive Skin Exams, Mole Removal, Psoriasis Treatment, Hair & Nail Evaluation and Treatment, Bacterial & Fungal Infection Treatment, etc.
- At Skin Clinic, we are in the pursuit of attaining great results for our patients and their skin, hair and nails.
: Clinical Dermatology
What are the 4 types of dermatology?
The field of dermatology encompasses the study of skin and skin-related ailments, but there are many subspecializations within dermatology as well. Some doctors get comprehensive degrees in general dermatology, while others undergo additional education to further hone their knowledge and expertise within a specific area.
What type of dermatologist gets paid the most?
Private practice dermatologists are the highest paid type of dermatologists. Those seeing the highest compensation possible should look to practice in a physician’s office. This includes independent or group practice. Dermatologists in multispecialty group practice made the most, averaging $382,000 per year.
Do dermatologists look at skin?
Featured – Find a Dermatologist You can search by location, condition, and procedure to find the dermatologist that’s right for you. What is a dermatologist? A dermatologist is a medical doctor who specializes in treating the skin, hair, and nails. Dermatologists care for people of all ages.
What is the difference between aesthetic and cosmetic?
YouTube Interview with Dr Barbara Kubicka – This new video on clinicbe’s YouTube channel explains the difference between cosmetic surgery and aesthetic medicine. Cosmetic surgery is better understood – this area tends to focus on changing people’s appearance through surgical techniques.
Do dermatologists fix acne?
Treatment – If you’ve tried over-the-counter (nonprescription) acne products for several weeks and they haven’t helped, ask your doctor about prescription-strength medications. A dermatologist can help you:
Control your acne Avoid scarring or other damage to your skin Make scars less noticeable
Acne medications work by reducing oil production and swelling or by treating bacterial infection. With most prescription acne drugs, you may not see results for four to eight weeks. It can take many months or years for your acne to clear up completely.
The treatment regimen your doctor recommends depends on your age, the type and severity of your acne, and what you are willing to commit to. For example, you may need to wash and apply medications to the affected skin twice a day for several weeks. Topical medications and drugs you take by mouth (oral medication) are often used in combination.
Treatment options for pregnant women are limited due to the risk of side effects. Talk with your doctor about the risks and benefits of medications and other treatments you are considering. And make follow-up appointments with your doctor every three to six months until your skin improves.
Do dermatologists do pimples?
When performed by a dermatologist, acne extraction is a safe way to get rid of blackheads and whiteheads. Another technique that dermatologists use allows them to get rid of a deep, painful acne cyst or nodule. To do this, a dermatologist will inject the blemish with a corticosteroid.
Can dermatologists stop acne?
A Dermatologist Can Help You Prevent Permanent Acne Scars – Acne develops due to the convergence of natural skin oils and dead skin cells plugging a hair follicle. Bacteria can also be attracted to the area and cause an infection. Your body’s natural reaction is to produce collagen to prevent or repair damage to the skin.
What is the most common dermatology?
Background – Acne vulgaris, or acne, is one of the most common skin disorders treated by health care practitioners and dermatologists. It is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin, affecting 85% of individuals in their lifetime, Acne commonly presents with closed comedones (i.e.
- Whiteheads), open comedones (i.e.
- Blackheads), pustules, papules, and deep nodules.
- Four key processes contribute to the development of acne: altered keratinization of hair follicles, increased sebum production, the proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes bacteria, and complex inflammatory mechanisms of both innate and acquired immunity,
Although it occurs primarily during adolescence, it is also prevalent in adulthood, especially in females.
What are the five L’s of dermatology?
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Reassessment of diagnostic criteria in cutaneous lymphocytic infiltrates Avaliação dos critérios diagnósticos nas infiltrações linfocitárias cutâneas Ana Cristina Cotta; Maria Letícia Cintra; Elemir Macedo de Souza; Luis Alberto Magna; José Vassallo Departments of Pathology, Dermatology, and Genetics and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil Correspondence to ABSTRACT CONTEXT: Non-specific lymphocytic infiltrates of the skin pose difficulties in daily practice in pathology. There is still a lack of pathognomonic signs for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant lymphocytic infiltrates. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the morphological and immunohistochemical profile of lymphocytic infiltrations of the skin according to clinical outcome. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective; histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis. SETTING: Referral center, university hospital. SAMPLE: 28 cases of lymphocytic infiltrates of difficult differential diagnosis selected from the records. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Eighteen histological variables and the immunophenotypic profile were assessed using the CD4, CD8, CD3, CD20 and CD30 lymphoid markers and compared to subsequent follow-up. RESULTS: The most common diagnoses were: initial mycosis fungoides (eight cases) and drug reactions (five cases). Single morphological variables did not discriminate between benign and malignant infiltrates except for the presence of Pautrier-Darier’s microabscesses, which were found only in mycosis fungoides (p = 0.015). Patterns of superficial and deep infiltration (p = 0.037) and also the presence of eosinophils (p = 0.0207) were more frequently found in benign lymphocytic infiltrates. Immunohistochemical profile of T-cell subsets showed overlap between benign and malignant infiltrates with a predominance of CD4-positive (helper) lymphocytes in the majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of clinical and histological features remains the most reliable approach for establishing a definite diagnosis in cases of lymphoid skin infiltrates. Key words: Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Pseudolymphoma. Mycosis fungoides. Immunohistochemistry. Differential diagnosis. RESUMO CONTEXTO: Infiltrações linfocitárias não-específicas da pele representam dificuldades diagnósticas na prática diária da patologia. Não há sinais patognomônicos para o diagnóstico diferencial entre infiltrações linfocitárias benignas e malignas. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o perfil morfológico e imunofenotípico das infiltrações linfocitárias de acordo com a evolução clínica. TIPO DE ESTUDO: Retrospectivo: análise histopatológica e imunoistoquímica. LOCAL: Centro de referência, hospital universitário. AMOSTRA: 28 casos de infiltrações linfocitárias de diagnóstico diferencial difícil selecionados dos arquivos. PRINCIPAIS MEDIDAS: Análise de 18 variáveis histológicas e perfil imunofenotípico utilizando os marcadores linfóides CD4, CD8, CD3, CD20 e CD30, comparados à evolução clínica. RESULTADOS: Os diagnósticos mais comuns foram: micose fungóide inicial (oito casos) e farmacodermias (cinco casos). Variáveis morfológicas isoladas não discriminaram infiltrados benignos e malignos, exceto pela presença dos microabscessos de Pautrier-Darier, que foram encontrados apenas na micose fungóide (p = 0,015). O padrão de infiltração superficial e profunda (p = 0,037) e a presença de eosinófilos (p = 0,0207) foram mais freqüentes nas infiltrações linfocitárias benignas. O perfil imunoistoquímico dos linfócitos T mostrou sobreposição entre infiltrações benignas e malignas, com predomínio de linfócitos T auxiliares CD4 positivos na maioria dos casos. CONCLUSÃO: A combinação das informações clínicas e histológicas representa a abordagem mais consistente para o diagnóstico diferencial dos infiltrados linfóides cutâneos. Palavras-chave: Linfoma de Células T Cutâneo. Pseudolinfoma. Micose fungóide. Imunohistoquímica. Diagnóstico diferencial. INTRODUCTION Classic textbooks have described five “L” categories for the differential diagnosis of lymphocytic infiltrates of the skin: lymphoma, lymphocytoma cutis, lupus erythematosus, polymorphous light eruption, and Jessner’s lymphocytic infiltration of the skin.1 Leprosy, syphilis, lichen striatus, necrobiosis lipoidica, bite reactions, and the mnemonic “DRUGS” categories of dermatophytes, reticular erythematous mucinosis, urticarial stages of bullous pemphigoid, gyrate erythemas, localized scleroderma and drug reactions, have been added to the list.2 Other differential diagnoses include lichenoid purpura, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, 3 multiform erythema and psoriasis.4 Ackerman’s algorithmic method includes mycosis fungoides 23 times in six different reaction patterns.5 According to Diaz-Cascajo 6 there is no single reliable criterion that allows distinction between inflammation and neoplasia in lymphoproliferative skin disorders.6 Distinction between benign and neoplastic skin lymphoid infiltrates is of utmost importance for ensuring adequate therapy and prognostic evaluation. Two recent publications have shown divergent opinions regarding the role of the immunophenotyping of T-cell subsets as a diagnostic tool for cutaneous lymphocytic infiltrates. Hudson and Smoller 7 stated that a simple CD4:CD8-positive lymphocyte ratio can be obtained from a cutaneous infiltrate that is predominantly comprised of T-cells and that this ratio can be used to make a diagnosis of mycosis fungoides with a high level of sensitivity and specificity, on the basis of studies made by Izban et al.8 Concomitantly, an opposing point of view 9 has been put forward, in which it is stated that predominance of CD4-positive cells is seen in a wide variety of non-neoplastic conditions and therefore cannot be used to discriminate cutaneous T-cell lymphoma from inflammatory dermatoses. The former opinion is substantiated by some works, 8,10 and the latter by others.11,12 Since no consensus has been reached in the literature, the purpose of the present study was to perform a review of the different causes of lymphocytic infiltrates of the skin via a retrospective study, with emphasis on morphological clues and also the role of immunophenotyping in making appropriate diagnoses. METHODS A retrospective study was made on consecutive cases of cutaneous lymphoid infiltrates of unknown etiology at the Department of Pathology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. From 73 cases studied between 1989 and 1999, 28 were selected. The inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of lymphocytic infiltrates of the skin presenting some histopathological findings similar to those described for early patch, plaque or late patch mycosis fungoides, 5 as well as similarity to histopathological findings of mycosis fungoides variants previously described, 13 and the availability of detailed clinical files and paraffin blocks for additional immunohistochemical studies. In the cases selected, the definitive diagnosis of mycosis fungoides had been established clinically and histologically, and was further supported by the course of the disease. For patients with mycosis fungoides submitted to several biopsies, the earliest ones were selected. Only patients posing difficulties in the differential diagnosis of lymphoid infiltrates were included. Obvious malignant high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas were excluded. Patients suffering from advanced-stage primary nodal lymphomas with clinically evident involvement of the skin were excluded, as well as those with evidence of extracutaneous disease appearing within six months after the diagnosis, in accordance with the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).14 For each biopsy specimen, slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin were assessed for eighteen histological criteria, in accordance with reaction patterns described by Ackerman and others.5,15 These variables, listed in Table 1, were judged to be present or absent and were recorded by two observers who had no clinical information at the time of evaluating these criteria (Maria Letícia Cintra, Ana Cristina Cotta). Paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were selected from files and submitted to immunohistochemical studies. All immunophenotypic studies were performed on histological sections of 5 mm in thickness. The antibodies used were CD4, CD8, CD3, CD20 and CD30, A steamer was used as the epitope retrieval method and the Envision polymer (Dako) was used as the reaction amplifier. Two of us (José Vassallo, Ana Cristina Cotta) evaluated the immunohistochemical sections for the percentage of stained cells, without knowledge of the previous diagnosis. Data were analyzed via the chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests respectively for morphological and immunohistochemical variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS Patients were grouped according to clinical data and follow-up. The groups consisted of: mycosis fungoides (8 cases), benign lymphoid infiltrates (12 cases) and suspected mycosis fungoides (8 cases). The latter category included patients under prolonged follow-up presenting large-plaque parapsoriasis (4 cases), or incomplete clinical and histological findings for mycosis fungoides and also incomplete response to non-destructive therapies (4 cases).11 The inflammatory dermatoses found were skin allergies due to drugs (5 cases, one with prominent photosensitivity), pseudolymphoma (2 cases, one associated with anti-hypertensive drugs), Jessner's lymphocytic infiltration, neurodermatitis, prurigo nodularis, lupus erythematosus, and erythema annulare centrifugum (1 case each). From the eighteen morphological criteria studied, Pautrier-Darier's microabscesses were present only in some of the mycosis fungoides patients (3 out of 8 cases; 37.5%) ( Figure 1 ). Superficial and deep lymphocytic infiltrates were less common among mycosis fungoides patients and more prominent in benign infiltrates (p = 0.037). The most frequent epidermal reaction pattern was psoriasiform hyperplasia, which was present in about half of cases. There was compact hyperkeratosis, or parakeratosis, in 75% of the mycosis fungoides cases, but this finding was also common in the groups with inflammatory dermatosis and suspected lymphoma. Absence of spongiosis was not a prominent feature in mycosis fungoides, in comparison with the other groups. Superficial perivascular patterns combined with interstitial patterns of infiltration were present in the majority of patients in all groups and band-like subepidermal infiltration was present in more than half of the mycosis fungoides patients. Prominent exocytosis with scant spongiosis was more frequent in the lymphoma and suspected lymphoma (62.5% and 50.0%) cases than in the benign infiltrate cases (30.8%). The presence of eosinophils was more common in the group of benign lymphocytic infiltrates (p = 0.0207) ( Table 1 ). The immunohistochemical studies demonstrated the presence of a predominant T-cell immunophenotype in all the cases selected, with less than 30% B-cells in all cases, except for one patient with suspected cutaneous lymphoma.16 CD30 was negative except for two mycosis fungoides cases. There was prominent helper/inducer T-cell (CD4-positive) predominance ( Figure 2 ), in comparison with suppressor/cytotoxic (CD8-positive) stained cells, for all groups. The CD4:CD8 ratio was about 4. CD4 lymphocytes constituted about 80% of the infiltrating lymphocytes in all groups. Statistical analysis did not show significant differences between the groups in relation to the CD4/CD8 ratio. There was one mycosis fungoides case with predominance of CD8 lymphocytes ( Figure 3 and Table 2 ). DISCUSSION There is a large group of skin diseases that are characterized by increased numbers of lymphocytic cells. For therapeutic purposes, benign hyperplasia needs to be distinguished from neoplastic conditions. In our material, the most difficult differential diagnosis was between drug reactions and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Both are more frequent in older patients undergoing chronic treatments, especially with anti-hypertensive drugs, and they are also described in the etiology of some pseudolymphomas.11 Another important aspect that must be considered in relation to drug reactions is their clinical presentation as erythroderma simulating Sézary Syndrome. The differential diagnosis for exfoliative erythroderma is always difficult and may not be established in about 30% to 40% of such patients.17 This includes atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, pityriasis rubra pilaris, contact dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, pemphigus foliaceous, leukemia and other internal malignancies.17 In fact, it may be necessary to take several biopsies in order to detect definite signs of cutaneous lymphoma. Lupus erythematosus and leprosy cases are frequent in our daily routine, but only one case presented histological findings allowing differential diagnosis with mycosis fungoides. Among the morphological variables that were evaluated, Pautrier-Darier's microabscesses were present only in mycosis fungoides cases and were absent in the other groups. Although 100% specific for this group of patients, Pautrier-Darier's microabscesses were present only in 37.5% of our mycosis fungoides cases. The high specificity and low sensitivity of Pautrier-Darier's microabscesses for mycosis fungoides that we found is in agreement with previous studies reporting frequencies from 4.2% to 37.5%.4,15,18,19 Prominent eosinophils were more frequent within benign lymphoid infiltrates. This may reflect the predominance of drug reaction cases in this group. The pattern of superficial and deep perivascular infiltration was more commonly seen in benign lymphocytic infiltrations and suspected lymphoma cases. The mycosis fungoides patients had been submitted to several biopsies. Disease progression is related to deeper infiltrates but we studied just the initial biopsy specimens. Prominent atypical lymphocytes did not discriminate for mycosis fungoides. Cerebriform lymphocytes are usually considered to be discriminating variables 4 for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides, but they were not prominent in the sections we studied. This was perhaps because we used the early mycosis fungoides biopsies in the cases when multiple biopsies had been performed. The low percentage of spongiosis within the benign infiltrate group may be explained by the chronic nature of the selected cases in this sample. Superficial, deep and nodular infiltrate and folliculitis could not be evaluated in two cases of mycosis fungoides and one of benign lymphoid infiltration due to scant reticular dermis, and the absence of adnexa in one case. One mycosis fungoides case had lymphocytes that were 50% CD30-positive, but this did not change the diagnosis to CD30-positive large T-cell lymphoma. CD30 should be expressed by the majority (> 75%) of neoplastic cells, in a consistent morphological context, to be included in this group.14,20 The absence of CD30 positivity in the other two groups does not characterize CD30 as a marker for malignancy, as it may be encountered in non-malignant lymphoproliferative disorders 6,20,21 and even in association with non-lymphoproliferative entities.22 Two studies published in 1999 took opposing points of view concerning the role of the immunophenotyping of cutaneous infiltrates.7,9 A high CD4:CD8 ratio was regarded as both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of mycosis fungoides by Hudson and Smoller, 7 on basis of an earlier study by Izban et al.8 In that study, 8 35 biopsies from 29 mycosis fungoides patients were evaluated. They found a CD4:CD8 ratio of more than 2:1 in 31 of the 35 sections, but no control group results were reported in that study. Bakels et al.23 performed a semiquantitative estimation of CD8-positive cells in frozen sections. They found a greater admixture of CD8-positive small lymphocytes in 11 pseudolymphoma cases than in 9 mycosis fungoides cases. No statistically significant difference between the groups was described.23 Nuckols et al.10 also reported that a high CD4:CD8 ratio was a helpful tool in the differential diagnosis between mycosis fungoides and inflammatory conditions. They presented a control group composed of spongiosis and lichenoid dermatitis patients. Their results indicated statistically significant differences between the groups but only for intraepidermal lymphocytes. The CD4:CD8 ratio in the dermis did not show any difference (p = 0.18), and about 95% of the counted cells were in the dermis. This included about 9.6 CD4 cells and 5.3 CD8 cells in the epidermis versus 250.2 CD4 cells and 124.8 CD8 cells in the dermis. Therefore, we should consider that this finding is much more related to the subset of lymphocytes that contribute to the phenomenon of epidermotropism than to the CD4:CD8 ratio itself. The reason why the mean observed was so high was mostly because of two mycosis fungoides cases with prominent epidermotropism. An estimate of the proportion of intraepidermal lymphocytes was made for the cases in the present study, but the number of cells detected was too small to allow adequate statistical analysis and did not differ from the CD4-CD8 subtype of T-cells identified in the corresponding dermis (data not published). On the other hand, Glusac et al.9 believed that predominance of CD4 positive cells is seen in a wide variety of non-neoplastic conditions and cannot be used as a discriminatory parameter for the differential diagnosis between cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and inflammatory dermatoses. Some authors also regard the CD4:CD8 ratio as a nonspecific finding, given the existence of cases of mycosis fungoides with predominant CD8. CONCLUSIONS Our results corroborate previous data in which it was concluded that the immunophenotypic profile must be considered with caution because benign lymphocytic infiltrates 9,11 as well as small plaque parapsoriasis biopsy specimens 12 may display predominant CD4 expression. Definite diagnosis still needs clinicopathological correlation and careful follow-up. Correspondence José Vassallo Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas Departamento de Anatomia Patológica Caixa Postal 6111 Campinas (SP) Brasil CEP 13083-970 Tel./Fax (+ 55 19) 3289-3897 E-mail: Sources of funding: Grants from Fundo de Apoio ao Ensino e Pesquisa (FAEP), Unicamp, nos.1074/00 and 1219/01. Conflict of interest: Not declared Date of first submission: September 18, 2003 Last received: October 30, 2003 Accepted: November 13, 2003 PUBLISHING INFORMATION Ana Cristina Cotta, MD. Pathologist. School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Maria Letícia Cintra, MD, PhD. Professor of Pathology and Chief of the Dermatopathology Section, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Elemir Macedo de Souza, MD, PhD. Professor of Dermatology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Luis Alberto Magna, MD, PhD. Professor of Genetics and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. José Vassallo, MD, PhD. Professor of Pathology and chief of the Hematopathology Section, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Correspondence José Vassallo Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas Departamento de Anatomia Patológica Caixa Postal 6111 Campinas (SP) Brasil CEP 13083-970 Tel./Fax (+ 55 19) 3289-3897 E-mail: [email protected]
What are the largest dermatology practices?
About U.S. Dermatology Partners – U.S. Dermatology Partners is one of the largest dermatology practices in the country, caring for more than 1.5 million patients each year with nearly 90 locations across eight states including Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, Maryland, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Virginia,U.S.
- Dermatology Partners patients not only have access to general medical, surgical, and cosmetic skin treatments through its coordinated care network but also benefit from the practice’s strong dermatology subspecialty thought leaders and medical advisory board.
- To be the best partner to its patients, U.S.
Dermatology Partners is fervently focused on providing the highest level of patient-first care, and its team, therefore, includes recognized national leaders in areas such as clinical research, psoriasis, and Mohs Surgery. As a result, we are able to provide you with premier medical and cosmetic dermatological care, along with the latest technology and treatment methods for diseases of the skin.
Which country pays highest salary to dermatologist?
No.1: Luxembourg – Specialists: $352,300 GPs: $278,900 A surprise winner – Luxembourg tops the list! A small nation with just above six-hundred-thousand, Luxembourg offers a cultural mix between its neighbours Germany and France. This is reflected in the three official languages; German, French and the national language of Luxembourgish. Did you know there is quite a discrepancy between the salary levels of GPs and specialists in the different countries? Check out our blog post on the pay gap between GPs and specialists for more information, Want to be notified when we write more articles like this? Register with our site to join our community of doctors who plan ahead for their finances! Original article by Sara Sabin.
Bio Latest Posts
Rebecca is a graduate entry medical student in Ireland. She is passionate about medical students’ wellbeing, encouraging people to find their unique career paths and enjoys every opportunity to be creative.
What is the highest paid doctor?
What are the highest-paying doctor jobs? – Neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, and general surgeons are the highest-paid doctors. According to Payscale, neurosurgeons earned an average annual salary of $421,000 as of March 2023. Anesthesiologists made an average of $322,980, while general surgeons earned $296,000,
What is an example of cosmetic treatment?
Types of cosmetic procedures – In cosmetic procedures, a variety of techniques and procedures are used, including facelift, eyelid surgery, body contouring, dermabrasion, laser skin resurfacing, implants and liposuction. Injections of botulinum toxin Type A (available in Australia as Botox® or Dysport®) or soft tissue (dermal) fillers, such as collagen or fat, may also be used.
What is an example cosmetic item?
Creams, emulsions, lotions, gels and oils for the skin (hands, face, feet, etc.). Face masks (with the exception of chemical peeling products). Tinted bases (liquids, pastes, powders). Make-up powders, after-bath powders, hygienic powders etc.